It's a well known fact
that the price of watching football these days is outrageous. To
give you an example, I've supported Chelsea since the late 1970's, and
the first time I went to a game in the early 1980's, it cost £3 to
get in the ground, and 50p for a programme. Now it costs £60
to get in the ground and the programme is £3.50. So admission
prices have gone up 2000% in roughly 25 years, and don't even get me started
on the price of food and drink in the ground. Up until recently,
I thought that racing offered much better value for money, and at a lot
of courses it does, but the admission prices at some courses are just taking
the p***.
The worst offender
that I've come across is undoubtedly Doncaster. I go on St Leger
day every year, and when I booked up in advance this year on their web
site, I was pretty shocked by the prices. £30 to get in Tattersalls,
and a whopping £48 for Members, and that includes the early booking
discount, as it's £50 on the day. Yes that's right - FIFTY
ENGLISH POUNDS !!!!!
St Leger day is a decent
card, but is it really 80% as good as the Cheltenham Festival, which is
£60 advance for the first 3 days. No it bloody well isn't.
You've got a group 1, 2 group 2's, and the rest is handicaps. Let's
face it , the St Leger these days is a trial race for staying novice hurdles
the following season, and a showcase for future national hunt stallions.
You also got the group 1 sprint cup this year, but that was transferred
from Haydock which was abandoned the week before, so that was a bonus that
you wouldn't otherwise have got.
Compare this to Ascot's
King George meeting in July, the Saturday costs £40 for the club
enclosure, and is a better quality card, or the Saturday of Cheltenham's
Paddy Power meeting, which is one of their best meetings outside of the
festival, just £30 for the club enclosure. Hennessy day at
Newbury is £40, King George day at Kempton is £45. St
Leger day compares very unfavourably to all of these, yet is more expensive
than any of them.
On top of the outrageous
admission prices, you now have to fork out another £5 to park your
car, which was previously free of charge. There's no free alternative
either, apart from some poxy park and ride scheme from the football stadium,
and if you've just driven (in my case), 120 miles, the last thing you want
to do is catch a sodding bus. They also make it as hard as possible
to get the car park badges, instead of selling them with the tickets on
the website like every other course does, you have to buy them over the
phone. Also, when you buy one of these, you don't get a choice of
which car park you go in. If you 're in the club enclosure and they
put you in the car park near the 2 furlong pole, as they did me, it's a
very long walk to and from the club enclosure entrance. Being able
bodied and in reasonable
health, this is no problem for Ivor Donkey (especially on the way out as
I'm usually lighter than I was on the way in due to the fact I'm carrying
a lot less money), but for older or less able bodied people, it might be
a bit of a struggle. Besides all of that, the car park that I was
in is also rough, uneven and totally s**t. It says on Doncaster's
website that cars are parked in the course car parks at the owners risk.
Are they talking about the risk of theft, or the risk of knackering your
suspension?
I've seen plenty of
letters in the Racing Post saying what a rip off Doncaster is, so let's
hope people vote with their feet and the sight of half empty grandstands
makes their bone headed management see sense. If the prices aren't
reduced next season, Ivor Donkey certainly won't be attending.
Doncaster is by far
the worst, but they're by no means the only rip off merchants.
For those of you who
have never visited a racecourse before, allow me to fill in the blanks
regarding levels of admission. There are usually three choices of
enclosure, firstly there is the members (or club) enclosure, which offers
the best facilities and race viewing, access to all areas of the racecourse,
and consequently is the most expensive. Secondly there is the tattersalls
(or grandstand) enclosure, which is generally about two thirds of the price
of members to get into. This offers lesser facilities than members,
with access to all areas of the racecourse bar the members enclosure.
Finally there is the silver ring, which offers no access to the parade
ring and winners enclosure, no grandstand, and is usually a fair way from
the finish. This is generally about a third of the price of the members
enclosure.
So if you've paid the
most money to enter the members enclosure, you'd have every right to expect
it to be the best, but unfortunately for members patrons, this is not always
the case. In fact, at quite a few courses the tattersalls enclosure
is far superior to members.
Hereford would be a
prime example, because the tattersalls enclosure overlooks the finishing
line, whereas members is right down near the last fence. The parade
ring is nearer tattersalls than members, and the facilities in each enclosure
aren't markedly different. You can have a meal with table service
in members, but I've never had a sit down meal at a racecourse in my life
and have no intention of doing so. You can buy decent food in the
tattersalls grandstand or any of the fast food vans outside for that matter,
so there's no point paying extra to go in members.
Huntingdon is another
good example, for all of the reasons mentioned above, but mainly due to
the vastly superior viewing in tattersalls. The grandstand is the
same height in both enclosures because it's the same grandstand divided
in two. Not only is the finishing line in front of the tattersalls
enclosure, but also the open ditch soon after the finish, which as anyone
who's ever been there will tell you makes for exciting viewing. So
don't ever go in members at Huntingdon, it's a waste of money. This
is true at Worcester as well, the tattersalls stand is better situated
for race viewing, and going in members offers no advantage.
Nottingham is another
one, the members grandstand there is totally crap, and designed mainly
for corporate hospitality, is too low and too small. It is also past
the finishing line so is hopeless for race viewing. The tattersalls
stand has it's faults (too many pillars along the front), but offers much
better viewing. So the members enclosure at Nottingham is best avoided
as well.
You're better off in
tattersalls at Wolverhampton too, the members stand is level with the finish,
but the tattersalls stand is much bigger, higher, and offers a much better
view of the racecourse. The members stand is just too low, which
is not helped by the fact that the track is as flat as a pancake.
Tattersalls is also
better at Windsor, as the grandstand is a lot better, the one in members
has probably been there since Queen Victoria was on the throne and offers
crap viewing as it's at the wrong angle to the course. To be fair,
the tattersalls grandstand is at the wrong angle too, but it's much more
comfortable and modern.
So when you go racing,
don't automatically assume that the most expensive enclosure is the best,
because in a lot of cases it isn't.
|